Editorial note
The aim of the elemental edition is to make the poems accessible to the largest variety of readers, which involves modernizing spelling and punctuation as well as adding basic glosses. Spelling and punctuation reflect current standard American usage; punctuation highlights syntax which might otherwise be obscure. Outmoded but still familiar word forms (“thou,” “‘tis,” “hold’st”) are not modernized, and we do not modernize grammar when the sense remains legible. After a brief headnote aimed at offering a “way in” to the poem’s unique qualities and connections with other verse by Pulter or her contemporaries, the edition features a minimum of notes and interpretative framing to allow more immediate engagement with the poem. Glosses clarify synonyms or showcase various possible meanings in Pulter’s time. Other notes identify named people and places or clarify obscure material. We rely (without citation) primarily on the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), the Oxford Reference database, and the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible. When we rely on Alice Eardley’s edition of Pulter’s work, we cite her text generally (“Eardley”); other sources are cited in full. The result is an edition we consider a springboard for further work on Pulter’s poetry. See full conventions for this edition here.
Headnote
Elephants provide the model for a surprising number of virtues in this poem. If upper-class Royalists in England had emulated their piety, industriousness, bravery, and fidelity, Pulter suggests, they might have turned the political tide and prevented the regicide of King Charles I, along with the side benefit of keeping their wives in line. Drawing on moralizing natural histories, Pulter excoriates the elites of her own class for their interlaced personal and political failures, flaws which extend into the realm of sexuality. Gentlemen, she advises directly at the poem’s conclusion, need to stop wasting their time by gallivanting about, drinking and gambling. If they don’t attend to their mates (which the male elephants do so scrupulously that they murder mates suspected of infidelity), they are likely to wind up with wives who fritter away their time attending plays, frequenting taverns, and committing adultery. The elephant’s graceful bowing to the rising sun, with which the emblem begins, gives way to a stern lecture on how the social hierarchy may crumble under the weight of its own immorality.Line number 1
Gloss note
personification of the Sun and an ancient Roman godLine number 4
Gloss note
Pulter’s description of the elephants’ worship, which may seem “vain” (idle, unprofitable, useless) to some, is drawn from Edward Topsell: “They have also a kind of Religion, for they worship, reverence, and observe the course of the Sun, Moon, and Stars … they reverence the Sun rising, holding up their trunk or hand to heaven, in congratulation of her rising” (Edward Topsell, History of Four-Footed Beasts [1607], p. 192; cited by Stefan Christian, “The Poems of Lady Hester Pulter (1605?–1678): An Annotated Edition.” PhD diss. [University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2012], p. 310).Line number 5
Gloss note
created things; the created universeLine number 6
Gloss note
the elephants’Line number 6
Gloss note
the countries in the East “try” (test or prove)Line number 8
Gloss note
Pulter’s description of the elephants as launching ships, fighting in battle, and mating is based on Pliny, The History of the World, trans. Philemon Holland (London, 1634), 8th chapter, pp. 192-99.Line number 14
Gloss note
break offLine number 14
Gloss note
lifeLine number 16
Gloss note
attractive in manners; excellent, admirableLine number 19
Gloss note
shadowsLine number 22
Gloss note
concerned withLine number 23
Gloss note
fears adulteryLine number 24
Gloss note
men of fashion and pleasure; fine gentlemen (sometimes ironic); those who pay attention to ladies; lovers or (derogatively) paramoursLine number 25
Gloss note
those who deny or disbelieve the existence of God but used as an anti-Royalist label for religious or political opponents in England’s civil warLine number 26
Gloss note
Be like them in noble actions; this is directed to the readerLine number 27
Gloss note
lack or flawLine number 28
Gloss note
Charles I, executed by beheading in 1649; “this want did make us bleed / In our brave king” suggests that a flaw in England or its nobility led to the nation metaphorically losing blood when the king bled (at his execution).Line number 30
Gloss note
Pulter suggests that aristocrats (“lords”), also known as nobles, failed to live up to their upbringing as such (thus invoking “noble” in its moral sense).Line number 31
Gloss note
pot-menders and shoemakers; here, representatives of commonersLine number 32
Gloss note
Nothing butLine number 32
Gloss note
lamentLine number 33
Gloss note
causes us to be in debtLine number 35
Gloss note
here, in the sense of fidelity (i.e., marital fidelity to “those you choose in youth”)Line number 36
Gloss note
drink alcohol, “rant” (be jovial, boisterous, or uproariously merry; lead a riotous or dissolute life; sing loudly, dance or play music), or gamble (throw dice)Line number 37
Gloss note
the wivesLine number 38
Gloss note
public gatherings open to all classes of people; “common” could refer to the community of a people or place, or the subset distinguished as from those of higher rank; it was sometimes used as a slur to imply lower-class status.Line number 39
Gloss note
rebellious, unruly, lawless; lustful, inciting lasciviousness; profligate, wasteful; frivolous, pleasure-seekingLine number 40
Gloss note
averse, reluctantLine number 41
Gloss note
you lack either bravery or “wit” (reason, intellect)Line number 42
Gloss note
either the noblewomen are so extravagant or undisciplined in spending money that their reputations are damaged; or they are so extravagant in circulating that they get bad reputationsLine number 43
Gloss note
exceeded unruly or lustful London-based, non-elite womenLine number 44
Gloss note
to it; here referring to moral behavior in general, or attending to their wives in particularLine number 45
Gloss note
a contented man who knows that his wife is unfaithful; also, a half-witted person Sorry, but there are no notes associated with
any currently displayed witness.